Is there common ground for defining a decent social minimum in Europe? T Goedemé, T Penne, O Swedrup, K Van den Bosch, B Storms Hart Publishing, 2019 | 14 | 2019 |
Social human rights as a legal strategy to enhance EU citizenship S Stendahl, O Swedrup EU citizenship and social rights, 103-124, 2018 | 5 | 2018 |
A Legal Analysis of the Possibilities and Impediments for Citizens Seeking to Enforce their Social Rights S Stendahl, O Swedrup Deliverable., bEUcitizen, University Gothenburg, 2016 | 4 | 2016 |
The Gothenburg law clinic and the use of threshold concepts in clinical legal education S Stendahl, K Åberg, O Swedrup Nordic Journal on Law and Society 4 (03), 2021 | 1 | 2021 |
A Social Minimum for Whom? Making a Case for a Normative Pattern of Pragmatic Decency S Stendahl, O Swedrup Kotkas, T. Leijten, I. and Pennings, F.(eds), Specifying and Securing a …, 2019 | 1 | 2019 |
Exploring common ground for defining adequate social participation in 24 EU capital cities T Goedemé, T Penne, O Swedrup, K Van den Bosch, B Storms Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp Working Papers, 2019 | | 2019 |
Regelverkets betongmur – några tankar om ’behovet’ av ett mer ’flexibelt’ regelverk O Swedrup Forskarperspektiv på offentlig upphandling inom vård och omsorg, 156-181, 2019 | | 2019 |
Asylprotokollet: EU-medborgares begränsade asylrätt i Sverige O Swedrup | | 2014 |
The social contract as an argument in delimiting a social S Stendahl, O Swedrup reading 5, 6, 0 | | |